From the source
Ideogram published a guide comparing commercial-use licensing and IP protection across AI image generators, aimed at buyers who need to know what permission actually grants.
- The company says it created the VELUNE examples in Ideogram, while reviewing published terms and documentation for Adobe, Getty Images, Bria,
OpenAI,
Google Cloud,
Midjourney and Shutterstock.
- The guide warns that commercial permission does not by itself confer copyright protection, exclusivity or a vendor commitment to defend a claim, and that those depend on the law, the inputs and the agreement covering the specific service.
- It notes that in the United States the Copyright Office's copyrightability findings distinguish human-authored expression from material determined by a machine, and that prompts alone do not make a user the author of the resulting image.
- Ideogram describes its hosted-service terms as not claiming ownership of user inputs or outputs and not restricting commercial output use, while assigning any rights it acquires in outputs to the user and making users responsible for third-party rights.