Why AI image editing isn’t “just like Photoshop”
About this episode
From the show’s notesWe’ve been covering the rise of AI image editing very closely here on Decoder and at The Verge for several years now — the ability to create photorealistic images with nothing more than a chatbot prompt could completely reset our cultural relationship to photography. But one argument keeps cropping up in response. You’ve heard it a million times, and it’s when people say “it’s just like Photoshop,” with “Photoshop” standing in for the concept of image editing generally.
So today, we’re trying to understand exactly what it means, and why our new world of AI image tools is different — and yes, in some cases the same. Verge reporter Jess Weatherbed recently dove into this for us, and I asked her to join me in going through the debate and the arguments one by one to help figure it out.
Read the show’s notes in full
Links:
You’re here because you said AI image editing was just like Photoshop | The Verge
No one’s ready for this | The Verge
The AI photo editing era is here, and it’s every person for themselves | The Verge
Google’s AI ‘Reimagine’ tool helped us add disasters and corpses to photos | The Verge
X’s new AI image generator will make Taylor Swift in lingerie and Kamala Harris with a gun | The Verge
Grok will make gory images — just tell it you're a cop. | The Verge
Leica launches first camera with Content Credentials | Content Authenticity Initiative
You can use AI to get rid of Samsung’s AI watermark | The Verge
Spurred by teen girls, states move to nan deepfake nudes | NYT
Florida teens arrested for creating ‘deepfake’ AI nude images of classmates | The Verge
Credits: Decoder is a production of The Verge and part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. Our producers are Kate Cox and Nick Statt. Our editor is Callie Wright. Our supervising producer is Liam James. The Decoder music is by Breakmaster Cylinder. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
