# TypeSafe AI — How Jack & Jill Cut Candidate Screening Costs By 88% With Jev

- Company: TypeSafe AI (typesafe.ai)
- Announced: not stated by the source (first seen 2026-10-14T22:02:24.783063+00:00)
- Category: not stated
- Coverage: not counted
- Announcement: no
- Group: routine
- Source: https://typesafe.ai/blog/jack-jill-jev-case-study
- Record: https://forck.live/items/22433-how-jack-jill-cut-candidate-screening-costs-by-88-with-jev
- Subject: Jev / System One
- Models affected: Jev, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
- Pricing: List price per million tokens: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $0.25 in, $1.50 out; Jev $0.042 in, output free. Cost per 1,000 candidates screened: Gemini $0.755, Jev $0.092

TypeSafe AI published a case study showing that talent marketplace Jack & Jill replaced Google's Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite with TypeSafe's Jev model for candidate screening. Jev maintained similar accuracy while reducing costs by 88% and cutting median screening time by roughly 50%. Jack & Jill projects $500K in annual savings and has expanded Jev to over 15 workflows.

## Evidence

Verbatim from https://typesafe.ai/blog/jack-jill-jev-case-study:

> Compared to Gemini, Jev maintained the same level of accuracy, with 88% lower cost and roughly 50% faster task completion time.

---

Record: https://forck.live/items/22433-how-jack-jill-cut-candidate-screening-costs-by-88-with-jev
Catalogue: https://forck.live/llms.txt
Current issue: https://forck.live/feed.md